09:29:08 From Jamie Chesser (she/her/hers) : Jamboard link for later: https://jamboard.google.com/d/1kfrYEjEYU7Nuaxx-mu1YqjAxUnnl1VPxUsTGiw2IVCw/viewer 09:37:02 From Matt Zimolzak - US Census Bureau : Audio is very choppy, is anyone else experiencing this? 09:37:18 From Dan Ross - Minnesota : My audio is good Matt. 09:37:24 From Michael Riedman : It sounds normal for me...trying reconnecting 09:37:31 From clydic : Audio is good here. 09:37:31 From Mary Fulton - Pennsylvania : Audio is good for me. 09:37:33 From Cy Smith : Audio good in Oregon 09:37:40 From Chris Chalmers - Atlantic : Audio good here 09:37:57 From Jenny @TeachMeGIS : Sounds good here in Houston. 09:52:57 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : https://www.menti.com/eexigx72as 10:00:57 From Michael Fashoway (MT) : Did anyone else run into character limitations? 10:01:09 From Megan Compton : Yes 10:01:21 From Mary Fulton - Pennsylvania : Yes we did 10:04:33 From Cy Smith : Only half the transit agencies are contributing to GTFS in the US. That model may not work well for what we're trying to accomplish. We need an approach that will ultimately work for everyone everywhere. 10:07:08 From Frank Winters : good point Cy - I think there is a pretty universal desire among states to make some edits to commercial data 10:07:40 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : Much of that is a matter of resources 10:08:19 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : the agencies that produce GTFS in the US cover more than 90% of the population 10:10:41 From Cy Smith : If it would be helpful to have a legislative mandate...and perhaps funding...we have an existing statute we could amend or build from to get there...Geospatial Data Act. Another approach is what NCEES did/does with the Model Law and Rules for land surveying, whereby nearly every state adopted or created their land surveying law based on that model. 10:11:41 From Cy Smith : Maybe we start with a GTFS approach while we take the steps to formalize in law...Just a thought. 10:13:13 From Frank Winters : I like that. Best of both worlds - we collectively figure it our, then the legislation makes it permanent and comprehensive. 10:14:29 From Cy Smith : And possibly helps fund it...beyond liability and security, funding is the other major sticking point I've found with data sharing. 10:38:57 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : https://www.menti.com/eexigx72as 10:39:52 From Cy Smith : Bill said this is largely State data. I'm thinking much of the data comes from local government...no? 10:40:17 From Karen Rogers - WY (she/her/hers) : You should have added an "I don't know' option 10:40:31 From Kathrine Cargo, GISP : agree 10:40:43 From Andy Rowan (NJ) : Well, that's more work. 10:40:47 From Megan Compton : I agree with Karen too. I am assuming there is more work required. 10:41:05 From Karen Rogers - WY (she/her/hers) : But it might be a flat No too 10:41:16 From Neil MacGaffey (MA) : Does issuing public records under CC0 make the source authoritative? If states aggregating data from local government, can states issue the data under CC0? 10:41:51 From Holli Howard : Spatial Authoritative Format Roadways - SAFR 10:41:55 From Holli Howard : ours didn't fit 10:42:07 From Natalie.Lee : Smart Streets is really close to "smarty streets" 10:42:15 From Holli Howard : Format or Feeds 10:42:42 From Mark Yacucci : We had Authoritative Navigation Data 10:43:00 From Michael Fashoway (MT) : Authoritative Navigation Data 10:43:11 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : I think SmartStreet is taken 10:43:31 From Jenny @TeachMeGIS : if you flip around 2 words on the last option, you get ADF CARS 10:43:48 From Miriam Pomilio - DE Office of State Plannign : I like SAFER 10:43:48 From Hammer, Evan (MT) : but "Smart Streets" ;) 10:43:58 From Karen Rogers - WY (she/her/hers) : I like SAFER too 10:44:08 From Cat Gracey (Safe Software) : Megan came up with Realtime Authoritative Transportation Exchange of Data (RATED) 10:44:41 From Karen Rogers - WY (she/her/hers) : I like that one too! 10:44:46 From Megan Compton : Thanks Cat :) 10:45:00 From Natalie.Lee : I love RATED 10:46:13 From Miriam Pomilio - DE Office of State Plannign : RATED is good too. Either RATED or SAFR 10:54:54 From Natalie Lee, GA (Spatial Data Programs) : How do we become a "partner"? is there a process? 10:54:59 From Kathrine Cargo, GISP : status map is in Mardi Gras colors! 10:56:15 From Natalie Lee, GA (Spatial Data Programs) : Great! 10:56:39 From Hillary Palmer : NAD submission is very easy and provides free data validation...I highly recommend getting in touch with Steve! 10:57:38 From Jamie Chesser (she/her/hers) : See you at 1:00 pm ET ! Thank you! 11:05:05 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : https://datahub.transportation.gov/Roadways-and-Bridges/Work-Zone-Data-Exchange-WZDx-Feed-Registry/69qe-yiui 11:05:06 From Jim Steil - (MS) : "RATED" sounds Excellent and 'RATED Roads' could even be a funded program (legislators LOVE alliteration). 11:05:55 From Cy Smith : One of the things we talked about in breakout 12 after Bill's talk was the notion of starting like they did with GTFS, with one transit agency working with a private partner to develop a data model. Could be a state transportation agency working with a federal agency partner. That's something NSGIC has a good history of doing...developing a national data model for use by everyone. 11:07:44 From Derald Dudley (BTS) : https://api.mcdot-its.com/WZDx_v3.0/Activity/Get 11:09:04 From Frank Winters : Agreed Cy. the traffic safety folks in NY are fully ready to jump in on bridge Clarence. 11:12:54 From Cy Smith : NGAC recently completed a document on public private partnerships providing some good guidance on how to make such partnerships successful and supportive of the NSDI. NGAC should be engaged in the effort we're discussing today, to help play a role when the time is right for taking a more formalized approach. https://www.fgdc.gov/ngac/meetings/december-2020/ngac-paper-advancing-the-nsdi-through-public.pdf 11:14:35 From Matt - Utah : Thanks for that Cy! 11:16:29 From Jamie Chesser (she/her/hers) : Jamboard link: https://jamboard.google.com/d/1kfrYEjEYU7Nuaxx-mu1YqjAxUnnl1VPxUsTGiw2IVCw/viewer?f=0 11:28:40 From Hillary Palmer : Other impediments pertain to routing potential such as whether or not a left turn is allowed, or if a street is one-way 11:30:32 From Cy Smith : Good point...so we could use the Work Zone model as a starting point for pretty much everything? 11:31:12 From Hillary Palmer : Also gates that may block a private or neighborhood roadway and, as is the case here in Alaska, some navigable routes are seasonal... Ice roads are traversable only in winter, whereas some mountain pass roads are covered with 20 feet of snow in the winter and are only navigable in the summer! 11:33:43 From Jenny @TeachMeGIS : I know many states have Transportation Research Centers that might be able to provide some funding in some states toward these efforts. I don't know the details, but just wanted to mention it. 11:33:53 From Megan Compton : Where can we direct our DOT folks to get involved in the WDEx? 11:34:13 From Hillary Palmer : Thanks for a great workshop!! 11:34:15 From Bridget Nolan : 3DEP Gap Analysis Workshop - https://nsgic.zoom.us/j/92381068115